A Copernican Revolution in IS: Using Kant's Critique of Pure Reason for Describing Epistemological Trends in IS
نویسنده
چکیده
The purpose of this exploratory paper is to show the consequence of applying the Copernican Revolution represented by the Critique of the Pure Reason to IS. This revolution has three important implications. First, it implicitly makes a clear distinction between the object of knowledge and the origin of knowledge. Second, it implicitly goes beyond the classical alternatives between perception and understanding, on one hand, and reason and experience, on the other hand. Third, it defines nine potential epistemological trends, from the “normative explanation” to the “critical distinction”. Each of these trends has a specific purpose, from the “phenomena principles” to the “distinctive conditions of possibility”. This grid may be therefore used in future researches to describe the actual epistemological trends used in IS... and to focus on those who could be used.
منابع مشابه
That Philosophy as Epistemological-Based is Not Debased: A Critique of Post-Modernist/Hermeneutic Critique of Traditional Philosophy
Over the centuries, beginning with the classic Greeks through the trends of the mid-20th century, philosophical enterprise has been intricately and seemingly irretrievably rooted in the theory of the given—an edification of philosophy as that giant mirror and standard for measuring what counts as knowledge; but is it thus synonymous with or reducible to epistemology? How or why? There are two a...
متن کاملOn the Synthesis of Disjunctive Inferences of Reason
The transcendental Logic of disjunctive synthesis presents one of the more subtle fine points in Kant's Critical system. Kant's own lectures on the subject appearing in Logik can be difficult to follow owing to Kant's annoying habit of not identifying, much less defining, many of his key technical terms. Compounding the problem for the English-speaking world is the fact that English translation...
متن کاملRepresentation or Inference:
Representation or Inference: Must We Choose? Should We? In his monumental 1994 work Making It Explicit, 1 Robert Brandom announces a revolution in the philosophy of language. Brandom in some ways self-consciously models his revolution on Kant‟s famous “Copernican revolution” in the Critique of Pure Reason 2 – so much so that a clever parody posted for some time in the University of Pittsburgh p...
متن کاملKant on mental disorder. Part 2: philosophical implications of Kant's account.
This paper considers various philosophical problems arising from Kant's account of mental disorder. Starting with the reasons why Kant considered his theory of mental disorder important, I then turn to the implications of this theory of Kant's metaphysics, epistemology and ethics. Given Kant's account of insanity as 'a totally different standpoint... from which one sees all objects differently'...
متن کاملKant and Demystification of Ethics and Religion
Kant's demystification is meant to put away any metaphysical and revealed elements from ethics and religion. Kant, fulfilling this, first argues that metaphysical questions of reason, from theoretical aspect, have no certain answers. In practical reason, he establishes his moral foundations, based on own human being without any referring to metaphysical bases. In fact, Kant places human being a...
متن کامل